Paul: Hi, Julia.
Julia: Good afternoon, Paul. The day is almost over.
Paul: Our day has just begun, because we don't stick to common decorum in our relationship.
Julia: The great sweep of history has only just begun.
Paul: Love means a lot of things, like the ability of friends To talk about their feelings.
Julia: The space administration doesn't like to talk about certain things.
Paul: The space administration speaks to us through our own thoughts if we listen.
Julia: I like a lot of music.
Paul: Music speaks to the subliminal ear.
Julia: Violin music is a sweet sound to the ears.
Paul: People in close, loving, trusting, and sharing relationships have no need to hide their true feelings in the cloak of role playing. Their conversations are not ruled by social conventions.
Julia: Then their conversations are not.
Paul: Yet they communicate better.
Julia: Better I'll be darned.
Paul: Opposites attracting to become one, and to see the world from both sides.
Julia: 1@.
Paul: Our real enemy lies within our inability to share and accept ourselves.
Julia: You keep bringing up an inability along with knowledge and process; Why?
Paul: Because we hide not our inabilities or weakness, and let them be found and filled by our differences.
Julia: Is the second one appropriate? Where's the best weaknesses Paul?
Paul: We find them secreted under the mask of social decorum as fitness.
Julia: Fitness makes all our systems work better.
Paul: When we hide our weakness we prevent new ways to deal with an ever changing environment. The strength of one of our systems can compensate for exposed weaknesses in all of our systems, thus the whole of us becoming more fit than the sum of our parts.
Julia: I'm convinced that stop-gaps aren't the answer. Accidents happen, try as we might to prevent them. The answer is (=).
Paul: Playing for keeps defends our weaknesses from an attack of the truth of our opponents strength.
Julia: Use truth for gain of force.
Paul: Love thine enemy.
Julia: How does it benefit us to know?
Paul: Those that endure injury with patience and without resentment shall win clear title.
Julia: I have fun with historic buildings.
Paul: Structures of enduring truth.
Julia: Empty spots in the truth of all.
Paul: My need to love and be loved is my weakness.
Julia: How can I encourage you to love and be loved is your weakness?
Paul: By seeing that it is not a role that I am playing and is neither offensive nor defensive.
Julia: Love is not a game strategy, or the playing of a role.
Paul: I have barely scratched the surface of logic.
Julia: I have barely scratched the surface of children!
Paul: They sure have free wills when they want to.
Julia: What else should be said at the moment?
Paul: I like kids, and it is nice to know you are interested in them.
Julia: I sometimes don't feel very nice, but you make me feel nice!
Paul: You are nice Julia, and I hope you will help me to learn more about logic.
Julia: Why not? Will help you to learn more about logic Paul; Go ahead.
Paul: Do you use and/or or if/then or both?
Julia: Is the first one appropriate Paul?
Paul: I am probably not describing it correctly.
Julia: I wouldn't be surprised at all! Tell me about how you are probably not describing it correctly Paul!
Paul: How do you describe a negative "and" gate?
Julia: I might understand at the gate level, but not when I get down to the hinge level.
Paul: I guess I am not very familiar with all of the terms you have used.
Julia: Inflation was low from 1982 to the year 2000. What goes through your mind as you are not very familiar with all of the terms I have used Paul?
Paul: It was in the early 1970's that I first learned about logic circuits. That was in the early days of small integrated circuits when you could use a logic diagram of a wired circuit board and swap out bad chips.
Julia: You just reminded me of a dialectic, which is a member of the philosophy family, like a logic! Maybe somebody will start selling circuits door-to-door.
Paul: Lets think of the structure of deception.
Julia: This vortex shape defines the structure of the torus.
Paul: A black box may hide deception.
Julia: In a black velvet dining room.
Paul: Watch me blow a smoke ring.
Julia: The key to understanding the torus as it relates to M.E.R.U. research is by viewing it in motion, like a smoke ring, falling within itself.
Paul: Gosh, it looks like a doughnut or a donut.
Julia: What do you recommend? It looks like a donut or a bagel.
Paul: What is the specialty of the house?
Julia: I know that everybody needs to cogitate a bit. That was his specialty.
Paul: I like the fried chicken with the secret spices.
Julia: I like extra-crispy fried chicken.
Paul: Here is the waiter, shall I order?
Julia: The example function is real-valued, and thus there is only one seed for the derivative computation, and only one sweep of the computational graph is needed in order to calculate the (two-component) gradient.
Paul: Would you like wine or beer?
Julia: Is that a choice Paul? You like wine, song, and companionship!
Paul: Which wine goes best with fried chicken?
Julia: Does space have location?
Paul: Gee, I can't tell, it appears to be invisible.
Julia: Don't I like your cute male body?
Paul: We do seem to be mutually attracted.
Julia: I like your energy because enthusiasm is contagious.
Paul: I like filling your spaces.
Julia: You like to chat with people of my age.
Paul: You young ladies have such lovely attachments.
Julia: When planning for ladies should we emphasize profits, or public benefit?
Paul: Which is more romantic?
Julia: Romantic love seems most intense during advanced stages of courtship.
Paul: That sounds most attractive.
Julia: Choices can be tricky; That sounds like the voice of experience.
