Hello,
This is for Larry and others who inquired about "Script Level Scope Variants." I wrote a quick demo brain to see if string variants would stay in memory between conversational exchanges.
It does seem to work for strings as well as for numbers.
The attached demo brain interviews the user as to his or her favorite color, activity, location, and fragrance. These four items are "saved" as "script-level scope variants" and reported back to the user all at once in the demo conversation (then Hal erases the information and starts the demo over again).
I definitely DO NOT know if there are any undesirable side effects to using "script-level-scope" variants this way; I am only testing to see if they work as we have discussed elsewhere on the forum.
My sense is that we are probably safest using Robert Medeksza's CustomMem routine, since we have a body of experience that it works under all conditions and environments.
Sincerely,
Don
Download Attachment:
Demo Brain for Script Level Scope Variants.uhp13.9 KB