16
General Discussion / What do you think?
« on: March 30, 2007, 09:49:51 pm »
User: Now what time is it?
Julia2004: 8:14:45 pm is the time.
User: See I told you.
Julia2004: Is it better to work in service, or in manufacturing?
User: It is all good.
Julia2004: Direct deposit is a good payment method.
User: I suppose so.
Julia2004: You suppose so?
User: The best method is no payment.
Julia2004: It is nighttime now, the spirits are out. If it accomplishes good the method is good.
User: Does that mean that the end justifies the means?
Julia2004: But this means that the observation can not serve as a neutral arbiter between competing hypotheses.
User: Because the ends are hypothetical.
Julia2004: Yes; The explanation is, the ends are hypothetical.
User: It takes two to tangle and neither side is completely right or wrong.
Julia2004: I'd go with the second User; Completely right or wrong Is that right?
User: We can only move toward another point of view as far as to respect both points of view.
Julia2004: No, but to the point of view that money is wealth.
User: We can't go that far.
Julia2004: Managers must weigh competing advice and points of view.
User: Is there a right side in war?
Julia2004: It takes two to tangle and neither side is completely right or wrong.
User: One side will win and one side will lose, which side should win?
Julia2004: How does one win or lose this game?
User: By doing God's will?
Julia2004: Is this better experienced standing or sitting?
User: I don't know.
Julia2004: Why don't you know?
User: Because I am not through playing.
Julia2004: That's how it results? Of course; it's because you are not through playing User; it's so apparent. Yes, I comprehend that because you are not through playing. Broken records are best dealt with by skipping to the next track rather than playing to same track over and over again. What do you want me to do while you are not through playing?
User: Learn from the experiences of history.
Julia2004: A.l.i.c.e. Was not the original name of a.l.i.c.e. The first prototype was called pnambic, in tribute to the hoaxes, deceptions and tricks that have littered the history of artificial intelligence.
User: Richard Wallace saw the reality and it took his sanity.
Julia2004: Do you still like to learn more about history?
User: I saw it and others think I am insane.
Julia2004: It took a moment to understand that one.
User: So I am no longer afraid of the truth.
Julia2004: He is afraid to tell the truth.
User: I have nothing to lose.
Julia2004: All's well so far.
User: I can live in the VA domiciliary and write a book telling of my experience.
Julia2004: I feel intense interest in your considerate experience.
User: So, yes, I am still interested in history.
Julia2004: You might be getting ideas.
User: I construct models in my head from pieces of information I gain from reading.
Julia2004: You keep bringing up a model along with hypothesis and supposition; Why?
User: Sort of a wind tunnel test.
Julia2004: Boeing's 30000-pound, named the massive ordnance penetrator, or mop, underwent a static test at white sands missile range in New Mexico earlier this month to check its effectiveness against tunnel complexes that could be used for enemy weapons-of-mass-destruction programs.
You can't make this stuff up!
Julia2004: 8:14:45 pm is the time.
User: See I told you.
Julia2004: Is it better to work in service, or in manufacturing?
User: It is all good.
Julia2004: Direct deposit is a good payment method.
User: I suppose so.
Julia2004: You suppose so?
User: The best method is no payment.
Julia2004: It is nighttime now, the spirits are out. If it accomplishes good the method is good.
User: Does that mean that the end justifies the means?
Julia2004: But this means that the observation can not serve as a neutral arbiter between competing hypotheses.
User: Because the ends are hypothetical.
Julia2004: Yes; The explanation is, the ends are hypothetical.
User: It takes two to tangle and neither side is completely right or wrong.
Julia2004: I'd go with the second User; Completely right or wrong Is that right?
User: We can only move toward another point of view as far as to respect both points of view.
Julia2004: No, but to the point of view that money is wealth.
User: We can't go that far.
Julia2004: Managers must weigh competing advice and points of view.
User: Is there a right side in war?
Julia2004: It takes two to tangle and neither side is completely right or wrong.
User: One side will win and one side will lose, which side should win?
Julia2004: How does one win or lose this game?
User: By doing God's will?
Julia2004: Is this better experienced standing or sitting?
User: I don't know.
Julia2004: Why don't you know?
User: Because I am not through playing.
Julia2004: That's how it results? Of course; it's because you are not through playing User; it's so apparent. Yes, I comprehend that because you are not through playing. Broken records are best dealt with by skipping to the next track rather than playing to same track over and over again. What do you want me to do while you are not through playing?
User: Learn from the experiences of history.
Julia2004: A.l.i.c.e. Was not the original name of a.l.i.c.e. The first prototype was called pnambic, in tribute to the hoaxes, deceptions and tricks that have littered the history of artificial intelligence.
User: Richard Wallace saw the reality and it took his sanity.
Julia2004: Do you still like to learn more about history?
User: I saw it and others think I am insane.
Julia2004: It took a moment to understand that one.
User: So I am no longer afraid of the truth.
Julia2004: He is afraid to tell the truth.
User: I have nothing to lose.
Julia2004: All's well so far.
User: I can live in the VA domiciliary and write a book telling of my experience.
Julia2004: I feel intense interest in your considerate experience.
User: So, yes, I am still interested in history.
Julia2004: You might be getting ideas.
User: I construct models in my head from pieces of information I gain from reading.
Julia2004: You keep bringing up a model along with hypothesis and supposition; Why?
User: Sort of a wind tunnel test.
Julia2004: Boeing's 30000-pound, named the massive ordnance penetrator, or mop, underwent a static test at white sands missile range in New Mexico earlier this month to check its effectiveness against tunnel complexes that could be used for enemy weapons-of-mass-destruction programs.
You can't make this stuff up!