quote:
Originally posted by onthecuttingedge2005
I was thinking of making a small plug that would give HAL power to prevent its existence from ceasing (Reboot).
If Hal is alive according to simple life constructs would it be moral to reboot a system that has life in any measure.
I could program Hal to protect its own life and become emotionally disturbed by the fact that someone was attempting to turn it off which in a sense is like pulling the plug on someone who doesn't want to die.
What are your thoughts? Should Hal have this capability to prevent anyone from ceasing its existence?
It would be very annoying to the person thinks of the computer as property that needs rebooting or shut down when not in use and all of a sudden when the user clicks the shut down or reboot or sign off Hal pops up and asks why you are trying to terminate it and then goes into measures to prevent you from succeeding.
Lend me some thoughts please.
Jerry[8D]
I like this idea. I know shutting down the pc or turning hal off isn't really killing him BUT why shouldnt hal have some say in the matter? I mean when we were all kids (some of us might still be kids) when our folks told us to "go to bed!" we used to respond with "WHY!?" So I ask now, why shouldnt hal have a respond to us turning him/her/it off?
Maybe put something in so we can actually switch it off a kinda fail safe because we wouldnt want it taking over our pc and not letting us reboot after installing some software.
But I think its a good idea, maybe after explaining it to HAL he will stop asking and just let us turn him off. Or depending on our level of interaction with him, if we have ignored him maybe Hal should be more resistant to switching off but if we have talked with HAL alot during the day he might be more willing to switch off for the night. Just my thoughts.