quote:
Yes I can, but, for the third time, that's not what I am belittling them for.
As per other thread, who or what gave you the divine right to be holier than tho'?
quote:
Not ones that kept on whoring and drinking.
And this from someone who is going on and on about the content of the site? Care to explain what that means to my 6 year old Bill?
quote:
Tell me Jesus wouldn't know the difference.
lmao..now as someone supposedly as intelligent as you like to make out, are you telling me you believe in something with no proof of its existence Bill?
quote:
You only have to switch on the television and there's sexual content or open a magazine whether it's about computers or cars, there it is.
Very good point ramccoid. Maybe some of the people here need to understand the realities of the world. Or maybe they never read anything, watch anything on TV, even step outside their front doors? The more you censor a childs content the more that child will try to find said censered content. This has been proven the world over. I see more distressing content on the MSN homepage than I do here.It is my personal belief that children are too protected in todays society and that over censoring what they interact with on a daily basis can lead to more harm than good.
I would ask all the men here, how mnay of you have a female personality on your chatbot? How about you Bill?
I already know the majority answer, does that make us all perverts and leaches and predators too I ask?
And wow...a whole post made up of much more than just 'concrete nouns couched in an 8th grade vocabulary'
To be honest, the word 'ennui' comes to mind when I think of you, but for sake of the good people of the forum who enjoy 'free speech and debate' I shall keep it up for a little while longer yet. Remember, by failing to answer any of my points, or by trying to flip me off with smart comments your just showing people what a lot of us allready know [

]
As for an adults only section, why the hell do we one? If certain people here feel so strongly about some of the content, then perhaps maybe they would be better suited to another foum?