i should also add, that i ran with this idea to try to understand more - this is something i've been pondering recently that feels more like a riddle ...a math puzzle
1st dimension, consciousness simply exists - there is no space for data to discover. all imagination, no empirical data to justify it.
2nd dimension, consciousness exists with a process because now there is space for data - awareness, you discover up and down, left and right.. an awareness of information.
3rd dimension, consciousness exists with a feeling because now there is space for emotions - emotion, you step back (z-axis ) with awareness and form an opinion of what you learned from the x, y axis..
4th dimension, consciousness exists with ______ because now there is space for _______ , you are now able to _____ with an awareness of emotion and ________ with what you have experienced.
this idea has been haunting me for a while now lol.
it's in response to attempting to conceive existing in a 4th dimension - where I can observe all 3rd dimension in one perception. Just like I can look at an entire piece of paper written in 2 dimensions, from the 3rd dimension.
it would seem to me that if science claims there are 10 dimensions, a consciousness must be equipped to observe it for it to be true, otherwise it is irrelevant to reality. it's like saying, what's on the other side of time, does such a place even exist to conceive it ? the answer to that is nothing, but there is no such thing as nothing - i'll stop there because i'll only go on and on about the yin yang philosophy. so much has been written about the value of nothing and it's a topic all it's own. it's the old what makes a cup useful concept.