MY RE OCCURING PROBLEMS.
when you have a doctor at Maintain west hospital named BRAD (my fathers name) speak to the wall and say "blame everything on me" its beyond a problem.
ALASKA, my wife / ex wife is named ANGIE and Angie often got advice from my dad BRAD, my dad is a creep, his words of demand while there were "TAKE A BITE OF THE APPLE AND THROW IT TO THE HORSES" well when my wife comes to me because she has SCREAM problems ,, what the hell is it im supposed to do???
the ATI call stub for external functions comes from my parents as well. they screened my calls and took on my identity all the way where my identity was arrested but it was me that was screwed over.
It's the same goddamn problem that is now between me and Alison, the asshole is just blindly selling people and more into positions they find they don't want to be in.
so if you look back at times where 'BRAD AND ANGIE' had a life (medias) I was never there for the joy or the problems.
the jerk just sits and gives the system the OK to do the same old crap. so if Allison has chose or has been kidnaped that is not of my doing and all the POS cops out here can not be trusted to help.
so go pound sand in your ass if you wish me to fix anything, including BOBS magazine store.
a long time ago in a different stat I was challenged with a problem, I did my studies and have a different way of dealing with this sort, it took a long time and thought which I have not been paid for. It is a SAFE wau that follows forensic procedure but is better because it limits the dangers to victims and innocent alike. UTAH is too stupid to do these things. how do I know
? the asshole cops out had NO IDEA ON HOW TO PROCEED WITH AN INVESTIGATION. they screwed everything up.
here is some code from the procedure set from a long time ago....that I was some of the reason for me being trusted to have the tools and a trusted investigator.
Processing
Assessment: Reviewed the case investigator’s request for service. The search warrant
provided legal authority. The investigator was interested in finding all information pertaining
to child pornography, access dates, and ownership of the computer. It was determined that
the equipment needed was available in the forensic lab.
Acquisition: The hardware configuration was documented and a duplicate of the hard
drive was created in a manner that protected and preserved the evidence. The CMOS
information, including the time and date, was documented.
Examination: The directory and file structures, including file dates and times, were
recorded. A file header search was conducted to locate all graphic images. The image files
were reviewed and those files containing images of what appeared to be children depicted
in a sexually explicit manner were preserved. Shortcut files were recovered that pointed
to files on floppy disks with sexually explicit file names involving children. The last
accessed time and date of the files indicated the files were last accessed 10 days before
the laptop was delivered to Mom & Pop’s.
Documentation and reporting:The investigator was given a report describing the findings
of the examination. The investigator determined that he needed to conduct interviews.
Next step: The employee who delivered the laptop computer to Mom & Pop’s
Computer Repair was interviewed, and he indicated that he had never operated the
computer. Further, the employee stated SUBJECT had shown him images of a sexual
nature involving children on the laptop. SUBJECT told the employee that he keeps
his pictures on floppy disks at home; he just forgot this one image on the laptop.
The State’s Attorney’s Office was briefed in hope of obtaining a search warrant for
SUBJECT’s home based on the examination of the digital evidence and the interview of
the employee. A warrant was drafted, presented to a judicial officer, and signed. During
the subsequent search, floppy disks were discovered at SUBJECT’s house. Forensic
examination of the floppies revealed additional child pornography, including images in
which SUBJECT was a participant. This resulted in the arrest of SUBJECT.
I am not recognized as a trusted entity in this state. MY DOCUMENTATION IS CORRECT> and Ive prevented more crimes than ill ever be thanked for.
The expert is from the NIJ (national institute of Justice)
2004
Jared (Tired of Blood Diamonds)
JARED W
